|
|
Post by Membrane_on_Vacation on Jul 26, 2015 2:47:32 GMT
"Another developing feature is a system that will create a leaderboard for houses. Using this, players would be able to get directions to visit certain published properties and could then vote on the house using the sign already posted in the front. Those interested in being on the leaderboard would have to opt in to this feature. And leaderboards wouldn’t be just for housing. Garriott said, “We are going to try and make sure we put them in for all the different types of game play aspects we can.” That includes PvP tournaments, decorating, and player quests."
looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooolz
|
|
|
|
Post by dewderonomy on Jul 26, 2015 3:31:16 GMT
Can't wait to find out who's beating who in those shitty tournies held under some flunt's $1,200 castle.
|
|
|
|
Post by Membrane_on_Vacation on Jul 26, 2015 3:37:29 GMT
I want a game where I can burn that house to the ground. GIMME!
|
|
Caliya
Strong in the Force
People fight to gain things they can't take with them in the end
Posts: 2,121 
|
Post by Caliya on Jul 29, 2015 19:40:53 GMT
I want a game where I can burn that house to the ground. GIMME! I actually asked for that feature in PvP. I said if they're going to design POTs and those kind of systems, they should allow us the ability to burn down castles. Make them pay for losing too. lol |
|
|
|
Post by Membrane_on_Vacation on Jul 30, 2015 1:15:08 GMT
haha. I bet that was taken to like a shit filled balloon!
|
|
|
|
Post by Housewife British on Jul 30, 2015 1:52:02 GMT
Looks like another marketing strat to influence people to buy more housing related crap from the p2w store. I personally hate leaderboards in mmo's, I don't think they belong. What keeps making me wonder is that development has been at a turtle speed pace, we have a very basic game with no in depth features that could be coded by a 15 year old, yet these developers seem to have the spare time to just toss in these random features that don't do anything for the game at all. Like that shitty arena combat thing, they wasted how much time on that and I doubt many even know it existed. I'd like them to put more time into fundamentals, making them more in depth instead of adding more crap features ontop of other crap features.
|
|
|
|
Post by Housewife British on Jul 30, 2015 1:58:30 GMT
Oh and Camelot Unchained and Crowfall is suppose to have the ability to build, I think Camelot Unchained will be more extensive but this is suppose to be in games with destructible worlds, meaning that you will be able to actually destroy, burn peoples buildings, towns, whatever.
|
|
Caliya
Strong in the Force
People fight to gain things they can't take with them in the end
Posts: 2,121
|
Post by Caliya on Jul 30, 2015 2:43:24 GMT
Oh and Camelot Unchained and Crowfall is suppose to have the ability to build, I think Camelot Unchained will be more extensive but this is suppose to be in games with destructible worlds, meaning that you will be able to actually destroy, burn peoples buildings, towns, whatever. That's interesting, but you won't find me investing in Crowfall. SotA left a really bad feeling towards ever crowdfunding anything again. |
|
|
|
Post by Membrane_on_Vacation on Jul 30, 2015 2:44:55 GMT
Also Crowfall has some serious community issues as well as some have already pointed out here under the crowfall thread. Plus, you have to buy premium time/vip account status/bullshit too.
Crowfall can get fucked.
|
|
|
|
Post by dewderonomy on Jul 30, 2015 3:04:58 GMT
Crowfall looks shitty. Same with Camelot Unchained. I think Albion Online, Shards Online and Das Tal have some future for what they're doing. The other games seem far too shallow.
|
|
|
|
Post by Housewife British on Jul 30, 2015 4:00:49 GMT
Apparently if you get banned from the Crowfall forums, you are banned from the game. lul
And I think Crowfall is making incredible progress, more than anyone else, the developers are actually competent and capable, they are getting it done. I don't like the semi cartoony look of Crowfall but it could be worse, not sure how anyone could think it looks bad compared to how bad Albion and Shards looks. There isn't enough pay to win in Crowfall to complain about either yet, if any. What worries me most about it is that the developers even say it themselves, it's not a MMO, it's a mix of a bunch of game styles, a new breed, so who know's what the play structure will be. Either way, right now Crowfall is making a game we have never seen and doing it well by the looks of it. From fully destructible worlds, thieving, pick pocketing, no safe zones in campaigns, which is where most will spend their time anyways, free aim active combat, extensive skill system. I don't see anyone else doing this at the moment besides Camelot unchained, but Crowfall is actually making progress.
|
|
|
|
Post by Housewife British on Jul 30, 2015 4:04:17 GMT
And there will be friendly fire, which will make for some funny situations. lul
|
|
|
|
Post by dewderonomy on Jul 30, 2015 4:08:37 GMT
It sounds a bit gimmicky to me. CU just sounds like DAoC's RvR and not a whole lot else. Maybe it's because what I've seen thus far focuses on their PvP elements, but it just seems like they're focusing a bit too much on the fighting and not much on world creation. I'm more interested in worlds and great player-driven stories than just running around killing each other.
|
|
|
|
Post by Housewife British on Jul 30, 2015 4:14:29 GMT
Yea Camelot Unchained is barely suppose to have pve at all, it's a PVP focused game. I think that notion is getting pushed though since people are asking for PVE so much. People in the Camelot Unchained community seem to be getting quite upset now that testing got delayed and they have been waiting for a game for years. The game is barely even into development after so long, I'd be worried too.
|
|
|
|
Post by Myrcello on Jul 31, 2015 12:16:40 GMT
|
|
